Access to Culture. Policy Analysis [Recurs electrònic] : final report / KPY, IRMO, Interarts, Telemarksforsking, NCK, EDUCULT
Detalles de publicación: [Wien] : EDUCULT, 2015Descripción: 423 p. : digital, fitxer PDF (6.97 Mb)Recursos en línea: Resumen: To use policy to redefine ‘cultures’ according to socially pluralistic, multi-ethnic and multi-religious realities of European societies, theoreticians such as Bhabha therefore warn against continuing national cultural policies that try to maintain (cultural) identities (to which it wants to provide access) based on concepts of cultural diversity. Instead, Bhabha pleas for the construction of ‘third spaces’ in which cultural negotiations and translations are possible. This is the point where the European Union comes into play and from where the present study departs. As a transnational political construct, the EU might be able to at least relativise the traditional, exclusively national approaches of more or less homogeneous cultural identities. Only in 1992 did European primary law first touch upon the field of cultural policy, which had followed the subsidiarity principle of only belonging to the competence of the nation states. The Treaty of Maastricht stated that the European community shall ‘contribute to the flowering of the cultures of the Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity, and, at the same time, bring their common cultural heritage to the fore’. Already after a first reading, the cautious formulations make clear that the EU at this stage did not intend to intervene significantly in this delicate national policy field or had not even tried to formulate something like a European cultural policy approach based on a common definition. As a result, we can recognise that much of the old terminology involves ‘identity’ or ‘diversity’. Nevertheless, as a new player, the EU entered the cultural policy domain by emphasising the importance of a new culture of governance that opens new spaces for negotiations among cultural actors as well as decision-makers on all political levels. (...) The project and this report were carried out by the Cultural Policy and Management Research Centre (KPY)/ Turkey, the Institute for Development and International Relations (IRMO)/Croatia, Interarts/Spain, the Telemark Research Institute (TRI)/Norway, the Nordic Centre for Heritage Learning and Creativity (NCK)/Sweden and EDUCULT—Institute for Cultural Policy Research and Management/Austria. All these institutes are experts in cultural policy; at the same time, their backgrounds in specific countries enabled the consideration of different national approaches to cultural policy and the relation to European developments. (Font: Foreword)| Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Signatura topográfica | URL | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
e-Libro
|
Centre d' Informació i Documentació del CERC Repositori digital | General | E150243 | Accés al document | Disponible (Disponible) | E150243 |
Foreword / Michael Wimmer, Angela Wieser -- Discourses about Access to Culture: Access to Culture and Political Power ; Politics of the 1970s towards the implementation of cultural democracy ; Homogeneity versus plurality – Towards the marketisation of cultural institutions ; Is the private sector taking over? ; It’s the media ; Towards a re-politicisation of cultural communication? -- Access to Culture – Literature review on the policies at the European level: Introduction ; Overview of the EU policy framework ; Review of research reports and studies ; Concluding remarks -- Comparative Study: Polity—Politics—Policy—Practice: National constitutions and culture ; Institutional Frameworks influencing Access to Culture ; Access to Culture as subject of politics ; Actors and Agents of Access to Culture ; Translating politics into policies ; Influence of EU documents ; Current issues—Trends ; Conclusion -- Areas of Access to Culture: Democracy and Access to Culture ; On Access to Heritage ; Digital Access: sharing or selling? ; Access to Culture from the perspective of Social Inclusion and Diversity ; Arts Education -- Indicators for Cultural Participation: Relevance of evidence-based policy-making ; An EU Framework on Cultural Participation ; Data Collection on the National Level -- Conclusions and Recommendations: Conclusions ; Recommendations -- Annex: National Report - Austria ; National Report - Croatia ; National Report - Norway ; National Report - Spain ; National Report - Sweden ; National Report - Turkey
No hay comentarios en este titulo.
Haga clic en una imagen para verla en el visor de imágenes